Modes of Contracting Marriage with Manus

There were three modes of contracting marriage with manus:

(1) Confarreatio. This was a religious rite the precise form of which has not come down to us. It consisted essentially in the sacrifice of wheaten bread {farreus panis) to Jupiter. (Compare the modern wedding cake.) The ceremony took place before the Pontifex IMaximus and the priest of Jupiter. Only patricians could marry by this mode, and only persons born of this kind of marriage were eligible to the priestly office. (Gains, I, § 112.)

(2) Coemptio. This was a purchase of the wife by the husband from the person in whose power she was. The transaction was by the ceremony of mancipation, in the presence of the balance-holder and five witnesses. Coemptio was the ordinary form in which any Roman citizen, whether patrician or plebeian, might marry. (Gaius, I, § 113.)

(3) Usus. Where a man and a woman not married by either of the above modes cohabited as husband and wafe for a period of one year, their, marriage, previously resting upon mere consent (free marriage), ripened into the strict marriage by prescription and the wife passed in manum. But the Twelve Tables provided that the wife might avoid this result by absenting herself for three consecutive (Roby, 69) nights in each year, thus interrupting the tisus for that year. (Gains, I, § 111.)

.

Effects of Marriage with Manus

By the strict marriage the wife passed into the marital power of her husband {in manum viri). The manus or marital power may be regarded as a particular form of the patria potestas. An uxor in manu was a member of her husband's household. Although called a materfamilias, this term did not have a meaning corresponding to the term paterfamilias. The wife was not the head of the family. She stood legally in the position of a daughter {in loco filiafamilias) of her husband. If she had children she was regarded as a sister of her own children. The relation of husband and wife, both as regards the wife's person and her property, was governed by the same rules of law as governed the relation of father and child. The law of husband and wife may, therefore, be considered as merely a particular branch of the law of parent and child. The husband had, in general, the same power over the person of his wife in manu as the father had over his child. Anciently, it may be suppo...
Read more

Slavery by Birth

The children of a female slave became the slaves of her master. The status of the father as free or slave was immaterial. The general rule governing the determination of the status of a child, whether as free or slave, or as citizen or alien, was as follows : Children born in lawful wedlock had the status of the father at the moment of conception, children born out of wedlock had the status of the mother at the moment of birth. Hence if the father of a child of a lawful marriage was free at the moment of conception, the child was free although the father should subsequently lose his freedom. As to children born out of wedlock, the general rule, as above stated, was that it was the status of the mother at the moment of birth that determined the status of the child. If the mother was free at the moment of conception but a slave at the moment of birth, the child was a slave, and conversely. This was the earlier law, but the rule was modified in the interest of liber...
Read more

Mandate (Mandatum)

Mandate (mandatum) was a contract by which one person mandatarius agreed to do something gratuitously at the request of another mandator , who, on his part, agreed to save him harmless from all loss in so doing. The mandator was said to give the mandatory a mandate, or commission to do the act in question. The term mandatum is sometimes translated "agency", but this translation is misleading. The mandatory is not properly described as an agent. Mandate was the only gratuitous consensual contract; the others, sale, hiring, and partnership, all being founded upon a consideration. Like the others, it was a bona fidei negotium , and bound the parties to do all that was required by good faith. It was of the essence of the contract of mandate that the mandatory should act gratuitously. But while this was true in a strict legal sense, it was allowed to agree upon a sum to be paid as a honorium , or salary, which might be recovered only by a special action and not b...
Read more