Modes of Contracting Free Marriage

The free marriage, or marriage without manus. was not required to be celebrated in any particular mode. Any declaration of consent, followed by the delivery of the wife to the husband or to his house (dustio in domum mariti) was sufficient, and whether such delivery was necessary is disputed. It appears that a man could by letter or message enter into a marriage although absent, provided the woman was taken to his house; but the woman could not "in her absence be married to a man vir absens uxorem ducere protest, femina absens nubere non potest).

It is to be supposed that cases of marriage where both parties were not present, or not followed by immediate cohabitation, were rare. Doubtless, too, most marriages were accompanied by various festivities and social observances, which, though without legal significance, tended most clearly to show matrimonial intent.

So far as the legal requirements of form were concerned, or rather the absence of such requirements, the free marriage did not differ from concubinage. Both were founded upon consent and both were accompanied by cohabitation. But marriage resulted from (matrimonial) consent, not from cohabitation {mtptias non concubitus, sed censensus facit. Dig. XXXV, 1, 15) and it was the intent of the parties that distinguished the one relation from the other.

The taking of a wife differed from the taking of a concubine only in the intent. Where the actual appearances were the same, there- fore, the status of the parties could be determined only by the aid of presum,ptions — marriage being presumed where the parties were of the same rank, and concubinage where they were of different rank. But by a constitution of Emperor Justin the presumption was always in favor of marriage.

.

Curators

Risk of Loss - Intermediate Profits

The Several Kinds of Tutors