Impossibility of Performance

As we have seen, a promise to do an impossibility, that is, something which no one, not merely the promisor, could do, was void. Such a promise created no obligation. And the rule was, in effect, the same, where performance became impossible after the promise was made. If the impossibility arose without the fault of the promisor, he was discharged. Thus, if Titius promised Gains a certain chest of money, or a certain slave, and, without the fault of Titius, the chest and rnoney were lost, or the slave died, Titius was released. Or if Sempronius promised to give to Maevius a plot of ground belonging to another, and before performance the owner buried a dead body in the land and so made it extra commercium Sempronius was discharged. But if the land belonged to Sem- pronius and he himself buried the body in it, he was liabk to Maevius for its value, the impossibility being caused by his own fault. (Hunter, 637.)

.

Curators

The Several Kinds of Tutors

Nexum