Cosureties

Until the time of the Emperor Hadian (A. D. 117-138) if there were two or more cosureties for the same debt, each was liable to the creditor for the whole amount, and a surety who was required to pay the debt could not call upon his cosureties for contribution. He could, however, before paying the debt, require the creditor to transfer to him his rights of action against the other sureties, and thus secure contribution.

Technically, the payment of the debt would extinguish it, and as there was only one debt for which all the sureties were liable, there would remain no rights of action against the other sureties after one surety had paid the debt. There would, therefore, be nothing to transfer. To avoid this difficulty, it was considered that the surety who paid the debt did not pay it, but rather bought the creditor's rights against the other sureties, and accordingly he could not be required to pay without a surrender of the creditor's rights against the other sureties. And the transfer, or an agreement therefor, must take place before the payment, or the payment would be considered as such and extinguish the debt and with it all rights against the cosureties.

The Emperor Hadian provided that a surety sued for the debt could compel the creditor to sue for only the. defendant's proportionate share as determined by the number of sureties who were solvent when the suit was brought, the share of insolvent sureties being divided among the others.

A surety who omitted to take advantage of this privilege and paid the whole debt had no right of contribution.

(As to suretyship, see Gains 3, 115-127; Inst. Ill, 20; Hunter, 565-579; Sohm, 384.)

.

Curators

The Several Kinds of Tutors

Nexum